Archive for May, 2009

May Flowers, Vertigo

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

For the finale of May Flowers I thought we should gaze at Alfred Hitchcock’s immortal Vertigo(1958). Aside from Vertigo descendants like Robert Altman’s Three Women or David Lynch’s Mulholland Drive what film is more appropriate for this time of year when we’re ruled by twin sign Gemini? Hitchcock films generally deserve complete dissertations but we don’t have Scottie Ferguson’s (Jimmy Stewart) stamina when it comes to fetishizing doppelgangers. So in the space of this blogpost we merely glance at his introductions to Madeleine/Judy (Kim Novak).


Ferguson has been hired to follow Madeleine and as he first spots her in the deep rose red restaurant, Hitchock slow zooms out from Scottie (far right) at the bar and pans left, following his gaze, into the dining area filled with flowers and well heeled customers and even a painting of a floral arrangement framed by floral arrangements before it finally stops at Madeleine (tiny, far left) in her emerald green dress.

As she leaves the restaurant we get Kim Novak’s first bewitching close up, carefully calibrated and emphasized by Hitchcock’s editor George Tomasini and cinematographer Robert Burks. Scottie likes what he sees but this is a job.


Some enchanted evening
You may see a stranger,
you may see a stranger
Across a crowded room
And somehow you know,
You know even then
That somewhere you’ll see her
Again and again.

-”Some Enchanted Evening” from South Pacific which (trivia note!) opened in theaters two months before Vertigo.

Scottie will indeed be seeing Madeleine again and again. His interest is piqued. Hitchcock sees this man’s spiral into obsession coming long before he does. When Scottie next follows Madeleine she enters a door in an alley way and he enters, not knowing what he’ll find there.

This is psychologically astute visual storytelling. Once he’s in pursuit, Scottie is cast into shadow and suddenly it’s all color, flowers, woman. This will be happening to Scottie again and again, albeit not in the literal sense. His personality will darken (obsessive bullying voyeur coming right up) and soon his life will be entirely focused on colors (it must be the gray suit!), flowers (his eyes darting from bouquet to bouquet) and this particular woman. All he will be able to see is Madeleine.

Or Judy as the case may be…


Scottie also first “meets” (okay, stalks) Judy, who looks suspiciously like Madeleine, in a setting bursting with colored petals. His eye is drawn there by a familiar bouquet… And then he spots Judy, introduced with a right profile closeup just like Madeleine. Her shot isn’t as elegant but she’s from Selina, Kansas. What did you expect?


Though she lacks Madeleine’s class, she’s practically a fraternal twin. Scottie will force the issue until she’s identical. Hitchcock, Novak and Stewart aren’t afraid to commit to unlikeable characters (pity that neither actor was Oscar-nominated for this, but then Oscar treated this masterpiece quite shabbily, extending only sound and art direction nominations) and the movie is richer and darker for it.

Vertigo makes you dizzy with its duplicate women, tripled bouquets — oops, I didn’t mention the third woman, Carlotta Valdes, and that painting that hypnotizes Madeleine? No?!


We can’t venture there, lest we be sucked into the knotty insane spiral of all of these doppelgangers. We don’t want to end up like Scottie or Madeleine who’ll violently toss her flowers into the river before jumping in herself.

This movie was all too much for her.


*

Marisa vs. Miranda vs. Judy ~ 1992 Smackdown

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

I regret to inform that I had to bow out of StinkyLulu’s Supporting Actress Smackdown for 1992. I haven’t participated in a long time and I had really hoped to. 1992’s women offer a wealth of Oscar discussables and tropes: the wisecracking dame, the old biddy, the longsuffering spouse, the maligned winner, the nominee who maybe isn’t being thanked for the performance she’s nominated for but for her entire year, the Woody Allen player, Oscar’s perceived anglophilia versus its perceived nationalism.

The nominees were:

My vote would have gone to Judy Davis (Husbands and Wives) and by quite a large margin. To drive the point home further, she is roughly tied with Julianne Moore (Boogie Nights) for my favorite supporting actress performance of the 1990s altogether. Unless you count Michelle’s Catwoman (Batman Returns) as supporting… and I’m never sure that you should. If I had a nominating ballot back in the day, these four women would have made it.

  • Helena Bonham-Carter, Howards End
  • Judy Davis, Husbands and Wives
  • Miranda Richardson, The Crying Game (I’m not sure what it is about this performance that I find so spooky but she really puts me on edge. 1992 was such a peak year for Richardson: This film, Damage, Enchanted April, the BAFTA & Globe win, the Oscar nom. When will she get another chance like this? She was even better in Spider (2002) but no plum parts as of late)
  • Marisa Tomei, My Cousin Vinny [new readers take note: she talked to me about this Oscar win on the first episode of the Film Experience Podcast]

Not sure about the fifth slot. I love Alfre Woodard in Passion Fish but it’s kind of a dual lead film, isn’t it? Who to put in slot five… Hmmm. Any suggestions?

Now get on outta here and enjoy Stinky’s Smackdown!

P.S. Oscar prediction updates coming June 1st and 2nd. Sorry for the delay
*

Wordpress Shopping Ladies Pink Web2.0 Theme Template

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

Wordpress Shopping Ladies Pink Web2.0 Theme Template

Wordpress Jumping Ski Sport Web2.0 Theme Template

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

Wordpress Jumping Ski Sport Web2.0 Theme Template

Wordpress NBA Basketball Web2.0 Theme Template

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

Wordpress NBA Basketball Web2.0 Theme Template

Wordpress Bleu High Technology Web2.0 Theme Template

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

Wordpress Bleu High Technology Web2.0 Theme Template

Wordpress Tropical Beach Travel Web2.0 Theme Template

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

Wordpress Tropical Beach Travel Web2.0 Theme Template